NNEX 


HAROLD  M.  WIENER,  M.A.,  LL.B, 


NUMBERS  TWO  AND  THREE 


NUMBER  TWO 


2092431 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       669 


ARTICLE  VIII. 

STUDIES  IN  THE  SEPTUAGINTAL  TEXTS  OF 
LEVITICUS. 

BY    HAROLD    M.    WIENER,    M.A.,   LL.B.,   OF   LINCOLN'S   INN, 
BARRISTER- AT-LAW. 

II. 

IN  the  preceding  article  we  had  occasion  to  assume  that 
a  close  relationship  existed  between  the  Armenian  Version 
and  certain  groups  of  cursives,  particularly  gn.  This  phe- 
nomenon is  one  that  constantly  impresses  itself  on  the  student 
of  the  text ;  but  to  enable  the  reader  to  see  it  clearly  for  him- 
self, the  following  tables  are  printed.  In  Table  V.,  the  most 
important  Armenian  readings  possessing  support  from  author- 
ities in  Leviticus  viii.  are  taken  as  the  standard,  and  it  is 
shown  how  far  they  meet  with  support  from  other  authorities. 
In  Table  VI.,  on  the  other  hand,  the  text  of  gn  in  certain 
passages  of  Leviticus  xxiv.  is  the  standard. 

Table  V.  reveals  a  number  of  very  interesting  phenomena. 
The  close  relationship  between  gn  and  Arm  appears  in  such 
readings  as  those  in  verses  9,  10-11,  16,  19,  30,  32,  embracing 
grammatical  points,  erroneous  readings,  and  alterations  of 
order.  Occasionally,  as  in  verses  17  and  35,  Arm  appears 
to  part  company  with  gn  through  accommodation  to  the  He- 
brew. The  grouping  of  the  authorities  makes  it  reasonably 
probable  that  the  Armenian  presents  pre-Hexaplar  readings 
in  verses  2,  11,  19,  27,  30,  31 ;  for  in  most  of  these  we  have 
clearly  Egyptian  witnesses  going  with  the  Armenian  in  pre- 
serving non-Massoretic  readings  which  contrast  with  the  later 
Hebrew  readings  that  have  influenced  most  of  our  texts.  On 


670        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct. 

the  other  hand,  B  appears  to  have  preserved  Hesychian  read-- 
ings in  verses  2  and  35. 

Special  interest  attaches  to  verses  28  and  33.  In  the  lat- 
ter we  have  to  distinguish  four  readings  of  importance : — 

(1)  r)/jiepa  ir\r)pa>(}r)  r/nepa  TeXetwcrew?     ( clearly  the   read- 
ing of  Origen,  as  it  has  the  support  of  Hexaplar  witnesses). 

(2)  i7^te/3«9  7rX77/3&)<reft)?  rjpepctiv  Te\et&><rea>9     (Arm  and  its 
allies,  and  M.T.). 

(3)  7T\t]pa>dr)  rjpspa  TeXeioKTco)?    (h,  Spec,  Cyr). 

(4)  rj^epa  TrXrjpwdrj  Te\eta>cre<o<?     (B,  m,  Chr). 

That  (2)  is  the  reading  either  of  Lucian  or  of  a  later  in- 
sertion in  Lucian  seems  clear.  Incidentally  it  should  be  no- 
ticed that  the  Armenian  and  its  allies  here,  as  in  some  other 
places,  show  a  closer  approximation  to  the  Massoretic  text 
than  Origen  himself.  There  can  be  no  doubt  that  the  recen- 
sion has  been  influenced  by  an  independent  study  of  a  He- 
brew text.  The  difference  between  (3)  and  (4)  is  merely 
a  question  of  the  relative  positions  of  rj/j-epa  and  ir^pwd-rj^ 
Possibly  this  is  a  non-recensional  difference ;  but  if  a  recen- 
sional  question  arises,  presumably  (3),  with  Cyril's  support, 
represents  Hesychius,  and  (4)  is  pre-Hexaplar.  But  the  dif- 
ference appears  too  slender  to  warrant  any  far-reaching  con- 
clusions. In  any  case  the  original  reading  of  the  LXX  is  more 
closely  represented  by  (3)  and  (4)  than  by  the  other  texts. 

The  other  passage  (ver.  28)  is  interesting  for  a  very  dif- 
ferent reason.  In  xvi.  10,  and  again  in  x.  4,  we  found  the 
Armenian,  gn,  dpt,  and  other  witnesses  inserting  some  words 
from  other  parts  of  the  chapter.  Apparently  no  Hebrew 
equivalent  had  ever  existed  for  these  words.  Here  we  meet 
with  the  same  phenomenon :  "  as  the  Lord  commanded " 
seems  to  come  from  verse  21,  and  is  found  in  the  Armenian, 
gn,  dpt,  h  (which  appears  to  be  descended  from  an  archetype 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       671 

that  had  been  glossed  from  some  Lucianic  text),  and  c.  We 
shall  have  to  note  other  instances  hereafter. 

Table  VI.  presents  fewer  features  of  interest.  It  is  to  be 
noted  that  the  closest  allies  of  gn  are  the  Armenian,  dpt,  and 
bw  (see  ver.  2,  5,  7,  14,  16,  19,  23).  In  verse  23  we  seem  to 
have  a  pre-Hexaplar  reading,  while  in  verse  8  B  and  its 
allies  appear  to  present  a  Hesychian  reading.  It  is  to  be 
noted  that  in  one  case  gn  and  the  Armenian  agree  with  the 
Massoretic  text  against  Origen  (ver.  7). 

Table  VII.,  in  which  readings  of  dpt  in  Leviticus  xxvi.  are 
taken  as  the  standard,  calls  for  more  comment.  Here,  again, 
we  find  a  close  relationship  between  dpt,  gn,  and  the  Armen- 
ian, and  some  considerable  connection  with  bw.  Further, 
we  have  once  more  to  note  that  c  and  h  often  go  with  one 
or  more  authorities  of  this  class.  Again  it  may  happen  that 
our  group  and  its  allies  agree  with  the  Massoretic  text 
against  the  Hexaplar  authorities  (e.g.  14).  Pre-Hexaplar 
readings  seem  to  be  preserved  by  dpt  in  verse  2,  perhaps  in 
verses  11  (a-T-rjcrco,)  16,  19,  29,  32,  and  43,  and  by  the  author- 
ities in  column  5  in  verse  11  (8ia0r]Kr)v),  and  perhaps  in 
verses  28  (h  and  its  allies)  and  44  (M,  Boh).  In  verse  18, 
Origen  clearly  read  eTrra;  Lucian,  eTrraKii;  and  Hesychius, 
•n-Xrjyais  kirra.  But  the  division  of  the  authorities  suggests 
that  the  two  latter  readings  may  both  have  been  current  be- 
fore the  time  of  Origen.  Here  dpt  seems  to  preserve  a  Greek 
gloss  (erepat?).  Lucianic  readings  appear  to  be  found  in 
dpt  and  its  allies  in  verses  6,  14,  27,  35,  and  45,  in  pt  and 
gn  in  verse  5,  in  dt  and  its  allies  in  verse  13,  and  in  gn  and  its 
allies  in  verse  39 ;  while  Hesychius  is  probably  represented 
by  h  and  its  allies  in  verse  16,  perhaps  (but  improbably)  by 
f  in  verse  20,  and  possibly  by  o  in  verse  22.  One  very  inter- 
esting feature  is  the  fact,  that,  while  bw  and  dpt  often  agree, 


672        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct. 

they  are  very  rarely  to  be  found  in  solitary  agreement  against 
all  the  other  authorities,  including  gn.  Both  appear  to  me 
to  be  based  in  part  on  a  particular  recension,  but  it  seems  to 
me  that  the  use  of  this  recension  and  the  other  ingredients 
employed  varied  very  greatly. 

In  Table  VIII.,  readings  of  bw  in  xix.  1— xx.  19  form  the 
standard.  It  is  to  be  observed  that  this  group  often  goes  its 
own  way  —  sometimes  from  an  approximation  to  a  Hebrew 
text,  sometimes  apparently  through  recensional  activity  sub- 
stituting different  Greek  forms  or  expressions  for  those  of 
the  other  Septuagintal  authorities  (e.g.  xix.  7;  xx.  16),  or 
again  through  textual  corruption  (xix.  22,  26).  On  the  other 
hand,  it  often  preserves  pre-Hexaplar  readings  (e.g.  xix.  12, 
27,  32;  xx.  2,  17). x  Sometimes  the  authorities  in  column  5 
appear  to  represent  the  original  Greek  text  (xix.  2,  B  and  its 
allies;  12).  It  is  clear  that  c,  h,  gn,  the  Armenian,  and  dpt 
are  the  most  nearly  related  to  our  text;  but  it  is  to  be  noted 
that  bw  and  dpt  will  seldom  be  found  in  isolated  agreement 
on  a  non-Massoretic  reading.  Nor  does  bw  often  agree 
with  qu  alone.  Not  infrequently  it  goes  with  the  Egyptian 
versions  (e.g.  xi.  2,  ord.  and  M.T.  \e<yovre<;;  bw,  Sah,  add 
ay-rot?;  3,  ord.  and  M.T.  kv  rots  /cTrjvea-iv;  bw,  Boh,  omit ; 
4,  ord.  and  M.T.  a/cadaprov  TOUTO;  bw,  Boh,  Eth,  transpose 
the  words),  and  in  such  cases  it  presumably  preserves  pre- 
Hexaplar  readings.  It  is  to  be  noted  that  in  xx.  19  it  joins 
h,  c,  gn,  the  Arm,  and  dpt  in  presenting  words  that  come  from 
verse  20,  but  are  not  present  in  the  Hebrew,  and  that  in  xx. 
6,  7,  it  appears  to  present  double  renderings. 

*In  xix.  5,  StKTa.  appears  to  have  been  the  reading  of  Lucian, 
and  the  nonsensical  Se/carijv  may  have  arisen  through  the  -a  of 
this  having  been  written  in  the  margin  of  a  MS.  reading  Seicr^*, 
as  an  alternative  to  the  last  syllable,  and  then  having  been  incor- 
porated in  the  word  by  error. 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       673 

The  former  of  these  characteristics  is  specially  marked  in 
gn  and  its  allies.  We  have  already  noted  several  instances. 
Here  are  some  more :  xx.  11,  ord.  e^^ot;  gn,  Arm,  dpt,  pre- 
fix  rjcrefirjKaa-iv  KCU  (dpt  omits  the  icai)  f rom  verse  12;  i.  3,  ord. 
SCKTOV  (aura));  gn,  Arm,  dpt,  add  e%i\a<racrdai,  from  verse 
4,  while  h  substitutes  it  for  aurtuj  ii.  4,  ord.a£v/*oi5;  g,  Arm, 
dpt,  add  £K  o-e/uSaXeo)?,  which  occurs  immediately  before 
(the  whole  phrase  is  missing  in  n)  ;  11,  ord.  Kapiroxrai .  gn, 
dpt,  add  6v<riav  (cp.  the  beginning  of  the  verse)  ;  Arm  ren- 
ders fructum  in  sacrificium;  viiL  16,  ord.  TO  areap  2°:  gn, 
Arm,  prefix  irav  from  earlier  in  the  verse.  In  this  pecul- 
iarity bw  does  not  generally  agree  with  gn  and  its  allies. 

The  text  of  gn  as  it  stands  often  incorporates  Hexaplar 
notes  (e.g.  ii.  16;  iii.  8;  iv.  3;  vii.  8)  ;  but  this  is  probably 
to  be  attributed  to  the  process  of  copying,  and  therefore  it 
must  be  eliminated  in  any  estimate  of  the  recensions. 

On  the  whole,  the  evidence  appears  to  me  to  point  to  the 
following  conclusions  as  to  the  groups:  The  testimony  of 
the  Lucianic  fathers  and  the  Armenian  version  makes  it  cer- 
tain that  either  gn  or  dpt  is  our  principal  Lucianic  group.  Of 
these,  gn  is  nearer  to  the  Armenian,  and  has  long  been  re- 
garded as  practically  the  text  of  Theodoret.  It  would  seem, 
therefore,  that  this  is  descended  from  a  Lucianic  copy.  If 
that  be  so,  dpt  represents  a  text  that  is  partly  Lucianic  and 
partly  pre-Hexaplar,  but  has  been  influenced  very  little  by 
independent  study  of  a  later  Hebrew  text.  It  must  not  be 
forgotten,  however,  that  in  Deuteronomy  x.  6  f.  it  substitutes 
the  Samaritan  for  a  Jewish  text.  On  the  other  hand,  bw 
contains,  in  addition  to  a  Lucianic  element,  a  large  number 
of  pre-Hexaplar  readings  and  a  strong  infusion  of  a  later 
Hebrew,  together  with  a  greater  amount  of  verbal  recasting 
than  any  of  the  other  main  types. 


674       Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct. 


1 

o 

ep 

<  J, 

en 

</i 

1  . 

-   ^ 

w     • 

4)       flj       ^~ 

ir™ 

"^     trl 

4) 

s 

^_,       JU 

*TV        •*-* 

O 

•J       W 

U 

1 

fcO    ^ 

.S  ^  -H      -H 

ifl     O     o            O 

i 

•O            T3       ^ 

o           o       a 

..     oS     g 

"S  .a  &n 

O            C    i-s 

| 

</> 

•a 

c  .ti 

U       ^ 

3     ° 

« 

o    «-• 

1  1  II     II 

II            II        II 

II   .5    c  S 

1 

D 

0      O 
0     C 

•2  2g    £ 

H          H      H 

HT3     o    '-3 
OS         I*         ^- 
I«H         fl>         ^.         Ctf 

^ 

H 

C     3 

>       O     ^               ^i 

S          S      2 

<;    i-    D    u 

^ 

^ 

O    — 

J 

,~-^—    'S' 

" 

* 

"3 

rt 

• 

tc  ., 

.S  "i 
I'-S 

i  ? 

X    ^ 

•I 

rt 

U      ^ 
rt     ^ 

S"> 

X 

o  ?! 

J-5 
11 

«f        •§ 

c,* 

o 

h 

1 

<;       -a  -o  <; 
--*        i-1    *"•  ^ 
M         o    O  M 

T3           "O    "T3    <J                    'g 
u             u     >-•    Jr     C             ^r 

0             0     O    M     bO          i-) 

4 

o 

•s 

o 

*H 

5 

el 

B 

f 

a 

1 

f 

U 

|> 

•i 

0 

P-    5 

i 

«  3 

i 

o     b 
k-    •«• 

Ji  o 
b  -fe    ^  0 

{ 

i 

g            rt     *     P 
J            ill 

4_l 

*        CQ.  -    a              cs 
^     -     a     -     t-                u 
P  9  jc    3  "5               rt 

13 

D 
rt  . 

a 

T 

B             >    -S     t- 

h     X     ^      X      X                        > 

> 

a 

J 

« 

13 

3 

cr 

!§ 

J3                          ^ 

^ 

I 

U                          X! 

H 
1 

•s           w 

.                   J 

1 

B 

€ 

M 

u                  g 

i 

lUthorities  a 

| 

4-.                                               O 

ot                            pQ 

c              "H 

U 

w       tj  tf 

•*-•                  rt     rt     c 

*         J  J  1^ 

£    c         c    c         ° 

d 

g 

i 

_^ 

^ 

1 
a, 

^ 

So             >^  o 

w>     SO           M    to    P^  PC 

M 

^ 

— 

P                            TJ      ° 

H 
I 

1 

*                "2s 

2             v 

1 

|E 

«*•             P 

(2 

8                    & 

'a                     ^  '2 

1 

J                   ^ 

•§•   *              5- 

J 

U 

o 
h               a 

a    ?"                   ^  •? 

0 

1 

b                    3.    _, 

f   3-  J    13    §    e    S 

^     *    <Q.    0     u     £     O 

& 

13 

U 

D 

-t                   t     > 

w    P-   a    rt  -S    i    3 
•S    t-  r<    >    a  •<    cr 

1 

rt 

S 

5 

> 

N                       »0 

c\        o   ••* 

•0 

t^ 

*" 

2s 

d 

* 

-      -   - 

s 

> 

w 


< 

H 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       675 


2 

o 

l- 
O 

•d  P  -d 

>-.     JT      u 

o  X   o 

J^ 

cu 

3        T3 
J.          - 
.          O 

O                            O     (V 

S 

n 

i 

IJ 

I 

1 

II  II  II 

0          II 

II             II  « 

L. 

LI 

II 

C 

H 

H 

E-  H  E- 

"•     H 

H                   H    C 

[_, 

H 

H 

o 

* 

S 

c,     g 

S                  s    a, 

f>                               f,    -O 

S 

K 

x~^-^ 

-~N^, 

o 

•i 

CU 

•tJ 

P- 

C/j 

D. 

C? 

E 

4= 

U 

43 

X 

i  • 

U 

P 

X 

0 

U 

"c 
» 

4" 

*J 

o 

-s 

o 

<?  "H 

Woo 

o    o    o 

o                   o    o 

•p 
o 

o 
<    42 

'*    «     « 

•d 

S 

•2 

o 

CQ 

1 

|l 

3 

K 

0 

m 

fe 

K 

** 

f?     S 

2 

3 

E 

§ 

P" 

<< 

K 

a 

b 

0 

1 

8 

-. 

3 

I    \ 

S 

i 

^ 

E> 

& 

3     h 

^ 

t    ^ 

P.    3     8 

^ 

|p 

• 

b     ri 

A               .3 

ti 

1= 

*     b     Xj 

K 

S 

f 

•Ml 

| 

| 

^    5     rt 
3     k-     y 
S    -S     > 

ly       O            "2 

til! 

ts            f  f 

rt                         33 
>                         t-     h 

| 

-p- 

Q.     C 

S.     S 
-P-   -P 

-<    ^    Jjj 

i 

vacat 

i> 

-0 

•E 

M 

VM    to  5 

NO*8 

3 

rt 

Q 

•£>  «  -5 

^r 

."ti 

3 

5 

bti 

'I 

3 

PO 
o 

(1)       C/5       s» 

«  o  1 

O,          ">s             Ml 
^O      > 

? 

O 

a 

M 

f 

1 

K 
b 
0 

i 

W 

o 

~ 
)« 

M 

0, 

43           T3 

ffl             C 
PH            bfl 

8 

13   'a   -L.  « 

i-)  i-J  3-  ' 

&^  J      ^  & 
IS"     f| 

y  w  bo  s   3   5. 

«             i_      5^     I-     se 

N 

'iT 

c 
Is 

N 
[T 

N 

•£-, 

'a? 

1 

Cfl 

"       r 

c 

% 

0 

l- 

"5 

"^     >     cj 

0    43    43 

c    c  ***    < 

60    SO  -O    C/ 

riy  j  oj  i 

tc 

3 
b 

bC 

0 

1  + 

i 

A 

t 

% 

b 

•M* 

i 
w 

2- 

3 

3 

1 

<§ 

b 
3 

BL 

1 

b 

• 

5       |M 

JT 

/< 

Uf 

^ 

h 

^ 

^  —  s      ? 

i  u               <•» 

t« 

% 

3 

1 

3 
o 

o 

i 

8 

CJ       U       §•   /< 
>        >      vi       * 

£B  2 

8     rt   -S 
<<     >      8 

1      11 

-P- 

3 

I 

g 

o 

I 

i-.  oo 

0 

- 

ro 

ro                          <*^5 

PO 

670 


Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct. 


e 

j3    to         ^ 

to    G 

C    —• 

bo 

»     M             S 

o    .t        ^ 

*"*      (U              ^^ 

T3         4J 

o    2 

J4 

1 

§•,:    ^ 

yx 

0       C 

U      >-, 

E 

3 

6   S  -g 

r  1  -i  1  -H  -H  c 

-^  ^ 

1  1 

i 

t- 

3 

0*0,0 

•§•8  II 

•a  |  o  |      o  o  S, 

B  -3    H    |        II    II     H 

D  n 

s  g 

II  K 

"S        n 

Q>             r\ 

rt  .22  H 

.2    M  ^    a        H  H  H 

H  H 

f-H     rt 

^o          H 

J3    S 

S  2 

>          S 

•3 

f 

~— 

M,. 

t> 

^^ 

.5  a 

rt          J3 

u 

c  3 
§'•3 

5s 

?     «  u 

_§ 

i* 

W 

-J3           **«*     ^» 

3 

3 

l| 
P 

| 

i« 

« 
o 

•§  §  rt"f 

P3  i  -^   x—  ' 

i 

N 

en 

j* 

3 

<J  a" 

"O   T>          'O   "O   T3     rt 

"2    S   <3  "rt 

<*" 

T3           "O 

pq  ^ 

O     O            O     O     O    < 

O    J2    PQ    CO 

PQ 

O     0     0 

a 

* 

I 

• 

2 

2 

* 

1 

s  1 

rt 

3 

u     a 

C 

X 

3        * 

5 

ll 

o    a         "^         t    t> 

S     b           <S           c§"  iS" 
||           J||| 

s  1  g- 

t!f 

0 

3 

C         K      w 
•**•     &      K 

v,    a    a 
h  -a    fe 

«H 

• 

h 

M 

H 

Vj     ^^ 

•^ 

C 

C    v 

a. 

• 

rt 

^    S         *^ 

•o 

Authorities  agi 
with  gu 

CO 

It 

S  U 

..^   <         'f 
H"  o    Q         S 
•5  V  1        !: 

<U      c      V.             <l 

£o  §      * 

U     <     -S             J3      g 

«             Ml 

S       5 

r>             D 

*rt        O 

J5              > 

(^                             rt 

*^          CO 

B 

11 

u    a,  Ji         a,  i; 

a.  -o   -S        T3  <! 

Moo 

•8 

o 

II 

a 

M 

^ 

"o 

B 

g 

w 

r< 

i    S 

C? 

S 

b   -§ 

•5 

g    p    • 

« 

S"                                     uj 

o      S.     E- 

V 

M 

s 

«    5         S0t 

pj     «           <to     S     P" 

"a          3  *°  * 

™     S             b     «     b 

k-      B      5 

Q.     *      p- 

•a   'ts   <S 
a 

§ 

o    u 
rt    rt 

b 

"S  "S   «S 

> 

X 

„ 

co^or. 

50 

ON 

=  2" 

-j 

> 
w 

PQ 
H 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       677 


1         1  \l 

O      rt      r* 

5w                                                                    "*      41 

•*-*    <u    *" 

"H                                            -                  J=      "2  c 

C    ^^     «i 

o                               3£                   **  ^ 

O    ^    CT"    o 

\\               a  £.      •£  ii             '1     ii  c 

.a  H  1  J 

H                            H  H              o  H                        ?        H    e» 

i  g  o  Si  a 

s                  s  s        fc  s               fL—lLr 

is  -5  "5.  £ 

£?                                 w 
3 

'  —                               iT*                "So            .-i 

•S                              ^ 

rt                                          M                      <!<              M 

IM 

03  tr             ?        "ox 

**•  ^                      °              *""•  cr      M 

1 

S    -«                               "1"                    iJ  •*.         fl 

c^  _rt                    ^^             g  rg      g 

^ 

rtiLT3'O                 'O'O            t^-'O             i            <£'U'Q'OfT3 
h*    Je    -K     C                        l-      i-               P     V    rfc      i                         »     ••     fi     G 

<iOoo              oon-rjaoO^-        «oooo 

^    73    -O 

*       l-     t. 

P3    o    o 

fe  * 

-e  Q 

1     3 

-  r^ 

•  C  a 

fc  ^  r           * 

«    IH      1 

4J                                                                               *-M*jP*-?                              jjlS^^ 

S      ,|  |           »  1  1  1  1  i  1       -  §  <§  §  § 

>•        -ex               £-3e;>-tj*h         «>£2>> 

.    if 

•Of-.                                                                                              ^              N     ( 

1 

13                                                           £         >    i 

1 

N     .S                                                                                                              fi.             *    < 

I 
1 

H                ^    "ti                                                                    "ttj 

u             ""   «    M                                                   2       _  "* 

^*                   «*i     c     C                                                                                 *             u      • 

:  o        ^ 

S              °    §  50        ^                                                     >  ^ 

:  -fe                   M         > 

^^gjrtS?                                   >afe-g^ 

1    *                   o         * 

g-  2,       r  i   .  a                         f  >*  I  "« 

^CM^S                                                          O<sJuP 

:  «                    |>        ° 

12       ^" 

<3<;'gic^         ^                  •§*?  ^  s 

3   ^rt                      *.           3 

P3H          ^O^           cf              ^                                   ^-pQj=.. 

,   "S,                      rt          rt 

I   ?  T 

^                                                                                I-    B    .fe 

b   S   8                     E 

*     K    —  '                  A            <*" 

^                                                             S    c               a         3 

-o                                                            3  -a    „                P"         a 

^^                                                     3    t    P-  15              ^          g 

8               g                     fc=>'S;3              'S-'?*9 

!    1    }.!    fill    111 

^S'                 r<                  "do                   Nv:-C8                   •  •«     • 

1 

'            1     1 

«                  1U 

^      -        z            5      -      s?            :;      I     . 

678        Studies  in  the  Septnagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct. 


Remarks 

v)    tin  ti  -a 

i  j  1  1 

**       M       O       £ 

„  .52  en   S 
.S   g        8 

tp.8    cKk 

•i  °-  "  S3     K           n 

.S3     ••     J1    «n          .J*                          |- 

*  1  *  1  .  8         p 

.2    1  8    i  -o"  H                     H 

•fl     I     2    c  •s                   "S 
.^,  u   -    a.  .s  <;                 ^ 

H!l 
11^1 

^  .2    S    2 

"S     «     °     co 
u  •?    <u    ™ 
15    *•    s*    <o 
9   O  "fit  B    . 

0  »•      y                 n 

a)    o    >^  c 

•5     c  "s    5                            LH 
C     O     O     t«                                  E 

j, 

•S                          J3     «> 

• 

iS  "5 

M 

C  in 

^-.  u        ° 

y5    ^-t 

"C      50 

c.5 

*O    ""            So 

3     « 

E  ti 
a1- 

»  « 
u.> 

^T-°"        is 
1-        ft 

g  S.     1  °  i 

tp    c/D                   S     fe     S 

M 

•C  2 

II 

3* 

s"    J        x 

_  ^    >^ 

<c  ^    *    <->    > 

x  ^  J  O    S 

c  s  S>2  ^ 

x  3              x         a<    . 
o  ^>,             o    ••    u    ^ 

^    J3                   J^    ^  "C    i-J    ^3 

O  W             O  '£  t    E    o 

1         » 

(A 

"3 

1 

V 

1 

o 

fe-  a 

u 

M       «        1        h        g 

• 

< 

S  |  1-  S  & 

rt                         c4                  o     pi 

<S     w 

<-              B- 

rt   -S     v    *.     t- 

o           a. 

>     8     X    ?-    b 

>                         >                 -o     > 

S         -if 

1 

60                          60 

J 

> 

E                          E 

'S 

ifl 

-o*                jS" 

tl, 

p 
tfl*£ 

N 

1                  J 

U 

•if 
1 

• 

Q 

es                                   c*                      Q 

.3          i  :    * 

K                    K              W 

0 

B 
< 

^           *O    T3    ^ 
C   C    C 

J3             O     0     0 

>-.                  >,            __. 

<:             <          o 

S                  »             pq 

c        | 

2 

Q. 

S 

•O 

o 

"o 

Si 

S         e 

.1 

5 

.s 

5           t- 

|A 

a         ? 

8 

a. 

1 

•*            oa 

-o 

T'2  1 

1         3-j    S 
;*           K  ^  «§" 

I                  -I            ® 

E  2  ,3 

X 

|      '                    ^                    ,,                -                     n       « 

& 

S 

PQ 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       679 


3 

&   P-  >^                       S5 

l>s 

*"     3     P- 

"3 

*f>    X    ~^-    ^ 

.S   b 

2 

C.tJ  57 

'5    f   a 

oJJ    r~ 

o    ^    3. 

°y 

e^  T3  *°    rt                    fi         *j 

c     b    4 

o' 
jl 

•g   o    >  "g    o          »fj       -o*^ 

1  I  -9  S  i        a      II  a 

3*1 

1  s  t 

>2  H   «    »  -="            H        H  H 

v    **    a 

2 

r.g°9tn               S          SS 
p»A    B    %  «S               »          *s*=i 

K  -o  -3- 

0 

N 

to 

V 

•4 

. 

O     cj 

•d" 

£ 

•o 

§       IS 

is 

£ 

k 

"2          ^  i4.            £ 

t    « 

rt* 

i 

^          c  ^           ^  o 

^                «-5               w  — 

*x"  0 
8    3 

c- 

1  J 

«»                        •"    Qd                              »«    fe 

2                                    2-0                          "O       r 

J3                          C    <4-i     t;                    O    J3 

•a      'H'H1^              S^o      "g  m  <; 

S            J 

O  J 

M  .h 

u     O    -C 

o         oo?5                 O-acuuo-sW 

C     0    XI    fe 

0 

0 

o 

IM 

"O 

(U 

15 

•o 

A 

1 

-    ?» 

if 

rt 

& 

1    vc 

—     a 

s     ? 
o     " 

.1 
1 

-=>    T3 
!     C 

5   — 

•c      rf 

5  1 
1  g  . 

11! 

a                                  2     §.          3     P- 
o                              e-                                        ?•     b             t-      K 

;     ^  f      r  •>  i  i  1 

1    >  i  1          2     e  g  ?  .1  ^ 

&         a 
*  <t  F 

s     ct     *• 

?      O      w      * 

t    rt    a    P" 
b     >     S     h 

N 

A       &                             > 

i 

O              •£                                                          * 

,, 

is 

*Q 

-°          •£                                           to 

o 

W  n                                               -f 

^                                                                                                4J                   JD 

1 

U 

S 

"O                 fc    .,                                              rt         # 
J    -                                  rt         ^           g 

v 

1 

O 

M           >-» 

--^   e  <     : 

O    60  S    <4 

it  Hi       5  i  i 

3^.£§j"O                *o        «         ao^rt 
:eo^<<jo                  o         c         uo^ 

|| 

s  9  <  ~o 

tc  fe    ao  o 

*     j. 

^ 

3 

I    S 

Ix 

G, 

a 

-O          *U 

3 

3        Q. 

s 

«*       'S 

_|. 

^t    P~ 

•0 

£2 

o 

P- 

P-    N 

§    ^ 

-    1 

p- 

jr  ^ 

o,                                                              g     °     «     S     3 

2  g 

«o 

1?    8     3 

--.;-    K  «o 

1         1  r                 4  i  C  r  I 

•*.                        O       ik                                                                        r-       3       L 

itf        "Sbf                  4"         IS-N'l-fe 

•o         !U 
S 

b            l- 

VO    tx 

00            O^    ••*                                 **O                          "^  ^O 

M                                              »                                      »       «H 

680       Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct. 


1 

.J 

rt 

. 

n                P  <«      t> 

K 

n 

^      -el  ; 

H 

H                       H  H        H 

•^                       5;  ^        ^ 

^j                                  M  M           M 

*  £  •£ 

43                      *^                   rr*'      ^* 

.56 

C                                        rt 

CO               N             '>      M 

43      U> 

43            "1                   C/3 

c  -S 

rt          '"^ 

O             D           43 

5>T3 

w   «:s                js 

§-S 

1! 

43-3^                                -° 
Srt    (/}                                  ^ 

^    ^    o"       .?i 

43*  E  J     sb:?            ^ 

|S 

313 

<! 

^^ 
>r   <i                                     C 

<J                     *          .-V                                              ^ 

•o   cT-Q  ^H  -0       "2  <;   M 
oZWCxo        o«O 

rtOJ-            43-^-         ^j           CCfl 
N£^       «0--fiO             x°* 
3     rt-^'e;'OM-5     rtW'°     U     i 
43^^     cf    S    -,    W    «    ^     SO42 

I 

1 

s                        «  i 

5 
3 
E 

1 

a    a    e                                    =    ^ 
?    a 
t=  -b  -£             S                  K    h    5 
"<u    »!  ^               1                   a    S.   « 

• 
3 

rt     ij                  rt           rt     tf     cJ 

g  |         jj      g  || 

ii.i*    «^       sit§. 

HI  -3      5          ^  J  J  8- 

-^I^S,     -S          2^^  + 

•S 

bo                      3 

1 

1 

r 

6           < 
*  —  ^           & 
->           *° 

1 
i 

fee** 

N—  '                       f3    *"* 

e 

•>"° 

•5                ^°  Ji 

3 

i 

M               «   " 

43    I? 

Authoriti 

1                fill 
*  -S         £  -8  & 

M    S             fc  PQ  P3 

*3     G 

'S  -2 
•B                 1  1.     ll 

O                                   O    W             0     > 

x                             - 

a                              § 

a 

-©.                  s- 

•a 

^                                                          "U* 

"o 

?         a    a 

a 

b  ^       "^         I    *" 

*w 

c 

8    ^ 

'•3 

%\\        \       \\ 

Jif   i    gl 

5                                           8     E-   "b 

0                                             *       S       3       P 

«o"                         >    ^    1"  9- 

^f                                   m     m     m     9 

*     b   X          -Cx          I-     b 

b                                   •_*^_* 

E 

vO       '                               OO 

O\                               0     « 

. 

-                                                                 M 

•*                                        N      N 

i 

1 


> 
M 

PQ 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       (5<Sl 


•a 

e*   V0            I 
O     >           .J-v 

to  .S        **"> 

Jf 

CJ 

Is     ^ 

1 

*.     rt     -d^ 

CX        r~         C   Di 

T3          JL.           O   >T3 

T3 
O 

TJ 

o 

"H 
O 

C 

o 

X 

u 

8   !       '^ 

y     t;            O     O 

<J    _rt 

H 

u     F    u  u 

H        H       H  H 

II 

H 

II 

S 

II 

H 
S 

1! 
E- 

II 

8   Sd  "g   1 

•-     -            rt     b 

=3  ffi    II  -a  i 

3 

h 

CO 

"^ 

J9 

M 

I               -s 

1 

3 

P                                              OT 

& 

CO 

X 

o                           *j 

•d 

O 

o 

PQ  -g 

43  ^                           2a 

N: 

J2                                      ** 

—        — 

<;  3  -g       -o  -o  -o   E 

T3    T3 

T3 

"S 

•X3 

<< 

^                                      O 

o   o    o 

P3    ^    O            O     O     O    43 

0     O 

0 

o 

O 

P; 

>,           JL    MH      ^    43 

4-  3 

1-1 

e 

N 

H  » 

•^                % 

i*» 

3                       I 

sj^ 

- 

g 

•fe                J'£ 

P- 

i 

o 

B                   *° 

& 

||i 

b            o 
1            |           °      *     rt     rt 

b 
ti 

b 

S 
s 

o 
& 

*               S    * 
3                 g     3 

*         '£•         *    fc    * 

»    rt     3     .. 

3 

ti 

1  || 

1     1      -SI  2$ 

3     t 
?-    a 

-<u      V 

ti 

•6- 

! 

b 

t      I  3  a  t  S 

i     f  1  ?  t  e 

\ 

| 

3 

a        43 

•o 

o 

^ 

^_, 

„ 

T    s 

g 

j= 

z 

& 

N            -S       n 

"S 

B 

^ 

43 

•5 

£ 

11, 

N             >           s^42 

*5S    s} 

0  ^  &o    ^  ^r 

J*  "o    o         c    3 

Arm-ed 

1 

g 

< 

c 

H 

g 

1 

•p 

fS    «     0 

2  PQ    g         bo  S 

43 

43 

43 

M 

o 

• 

• 

4. 

"fc 

9 

13 

3                 §. 

«*j 

«« 

-b 

J 

O 

O 

c^ 

3 

irpoffttriffu 

7(TW 

iioi  laovra.1 

S 
=                    3 

£               2 

S          a  S^ 
*         *  a  -1 

o 

s 

o 
N 

"H 

0 

a 
5- 

3     rt 

s   cS 

£ 

b 

wvKat  5<aT 

1                 * 

18-          ec; 

!     If 

i  1  § 

j  **  J  i  1 

i 

0      0 

i-     ra 
60    > 

o    ^ 

i—     rt 
60    > 

i 

4 

e 

ji 

h                   s^    B 

N 

o 

PI 

N                M      PI      M      N 

N 

fO 

€82       Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct. 


> 

pq 


6C    = 

rt    '<0 

Sj- 

C    "" 

'S   i 

OJ     "° 

K>      — 

c    ° 

K   ^ 

*•  i-3 

o     c 

rt  ^o 

*j 

1 

O      t* 

0     >      . 

M      2 

a 

S 
u 

M 

&l                       ? 

0    §  d         o 

c 

II  H    ||          II 

f1   5    c  "°    II 

o    o3 

H    rt  -0         E"1 

s  s  >     s 

H    o   ^     rt    H 

»  1 

ft 

11 

•SJS 

"o 

«" 

0            11 

•sfS       -s 

0     0    S                   O 

'H 

O 

t's.      2 

•3 

t  1 

rt 

e 

3  £           -e- 

*-    a               S 

u 

Ahernativ 

*    1               * 

i  ig-  ^  ^  | 

"B    £    e    s  -P- 
* 

3 

4i 

*  3 

111      ! 

1 

-0 

3                  a 

A 

Jj 

, 

5 

1-1 

^c                   & 

H 

c 

0" 

H 

'33    . 

• 

k| 

M 

|                                g 

rt°O. 

H 

U 

u 

in 

E 

1 

0 
a 

-§              1 

3 

* 

E  « 

rt   >-H                 tjo 

•S 

F 

~v 

•o 

3 

a. 

3 

m 

•o 

| 

a 

"3 

fe. 

i- 

1 

%. 

3 

ki 

1 

* 

8 
| 

•Vt 

3-                                     !. 

*    f.                      3 
^3                        & 

£  t  /• 

?~   -0     -<u                                   fe 

i 

1l 

X 

X 

«o                   ^r 

•*J-                              •* 

IT 

3 

—    4J 


.5  J= 

*3     (J 

pe  -S 

w    „ 

cr  o 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       683 


§  i  i  ^              ~ 

P~      g       S       N                                                    *C 

*-     b    *5     u    .<                             r*1 

\,        IS      "£      #      rJ^                                                   W 

d      . 
^    ^ 

CA                C 

O    to            n     r~ 

*         •      •& 

<y       w 

£ 

M 

•     £*       _        «.      */l 

£   &J^ 

.fl 

tr\    ^p    f 

*  O       ^ 

II 

c- 

g.  C  h  -1:  £j              <£ 
fc  ;:  -s  >  "               ^  rz 

•Q            3                                                                                                                                      ^     t"1 

II  II  F 

H  H  H 

i1  ii     ii 

H  H        H 

s 

'o   -3-  'b   -^  S                               S   S 

S  S  S 

S  S        S 

•a 

^-^ 

-a 

Iv 

M 

gnArm-co 

CO 

£E   e          1   ^ 

& 
en 

-s    <-> 

S)     I 

I    1  f 

N 

> 
"5T 

oT 

•o  *g  fc       fl                         go« 

W  i-4 

«"  i 

•^ 

.C 
£'     « 

<    o    g 
pq  pq    0 

AC  M  ^       bc.^'H"S'H"H'5rt<_, 
Q<ipq    »^jn    5?o    o   o    opqcnis 

^5      S 

pq  ^ 

"2  "H   c   ^ 
o    o    tc  o 

g  1 

>-* 

*O    T3    ^ri           *O 

pq  o  o  pq       S 

rt* 

<  J§ 

Pq  fe 

h 

§     1 

2  <F 

^-    s 

"e    8    3 

fp* 

£  *    a- 

,     3 

**    ~  "^ 

g-  g. 

«    &  K  «    §    §         | 

1  e  § 

^     b                   M 

S  * 

fa            B 

t-             N 

S*  li 

S  E  g  ? 

e    p    S    3          S 

!!§•!•     -fe 

•s  -a    N    *         a 

»-fl 

-S    -8 

1 

u 

(U 
0, 

o 
• 

a 

**• 

^cn 

0.    C 

•s 

en    so 

j    W) 

W 

x  — 

O    CM 

rt    o 

£J 

;    i! 

o 

PQ 

r^    * 

O    > 
J-E- 

O     J' 

pq  ^ 
£  ^ 

J3    JS    ^-x 

o  en    t* 

«  o  e 

*n     ^ 

fc* 

^—                                                          "^                    r^      g 

^M        ^^ 

M      •— 

O 

o                                iM  u   u  K   e^ 

>.  eq 

o  en  js 

•c 

« 

§ 

£" 

-| 

& 

£• 

I 

^ 

-=> 

B 

? 

S    S 
S-  £• 

t-.           ^     3 

iC     -Q.   «p 
£       jj     *U/     x_^     g 

*      t                                          ^      K      2>      ^      oi 

3    S                        <5  -5    o    e    3 

K    *o                            .   *6     3     b     f-     *«: 

2 
b 

£  S 

N     §     3 
o    •= 

i  g  § 

,   n 

uj                       Jl?       "O 

**"          ^     </>            * 
P           t>     3           3 

L    ||   4 

-e          t=    «          B 

§ 

8- 

<£> 
I 

M 

^o                          r»*  oo    ON  o    M 

N 

m       vo  oo         o 

684       Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Te.vts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct. 


i 

n 

8) 

1 

(4 

W 
C^ 

n 
a 

h 

% 

H 

••     u 
P"   C/2 

£ 

"O    '^    T3    *^    ''O    'rt 

o                        ^        •      >               i-i 

1—  bo  3C 

8 

O     O     O     O     O     o 

^            1  "•  -S       ° 

*«^       L_                                It 

»n  "3    ' 

1!    1!    II    II    II   II 

to       -a  n  «      " 

13 

H  H  H  H  H  H 

9             >  H  H        H 

H    |   0 

s  s  s  s  s  s 

S  02  r 

"So 

M 
s  <f> 

^ 

| 

3 

to 

c.S 

OJ-O 

Z 

J2 

^ 

rt 

£  v 

•  rH 

IP 

00 

''IT* 

o.1" 
|.| 

O, 

§3 

UH                                        -S 

1 

1 

11 

•o                  gj 

•3 

rt* 

'3-" 

rt 

o 

^" 

^ 

•< 

S 

^    TT    T3    T)    "d    T3    T3 

O    H-I    ),i    «-»    »rt    *rt    t~l 

<          "2 

O 

U     O     O     O     O     O     O 

<!    o    o    o    o    o    o 

K*^    W          C       ^          O 

0 

g 

A                      K 

<g 

5                     ^ 

rt 

-=>    b         ?   S 

I-" 

a    3.        §    ° 

E 

-<U      -=>                       Q.       3 

Alternati' 

f 

3 
I 

4 

p-             c 
<*>                 -:.>,„ 

I              s  b 
f  •  i,  «  *  3 

w    3    &   W          ^ 

£   2-  N   S  +  -S  "i 

k  a      ^  § 

frfii  1  a  «  «s 

^  gj-s-  g-  S   3.  a 

-^       ">       ^       ^      03       5"      O 

-^.  -^-  -C  -a    >  -C    h 

ooo           P- 
t-     k-     h     g     b 

3       3       =>       S       0 

x  x  x    a.   p. 
P-   P-   P-  -=>    (5 

0        0        0        0        S 

g-  g-  g-  g-  .§• 

| 

1 

0 

P 

S 

u" 

1 

V 

•3 

<• 

Ij 

S 

h-5    ^              -S 

•3 

w  T 

^    S             W 

1 

g  u 

W  <             G 

.c 

3 

*U    .-3          jg 

N    .-        c  3 

—            >     C            W)  £ 

8 

c  #        « 

60  PM           M 

M              ^    *              t~ 

13          5?  b         R   >, 

o. 

C/3 

> 

MM 

| 

v> 

J 

(IS 

-P        3- 

J 

"3 

s 

^         g-        S 

•p 

M 

a 

1 

s-1 

1      S  -  t 

vS                 f-      «        P 

&                      w      A 

1 

®  *•  i  g  *  ~ 

«    S  g_b  _S  § 

c-       -0    S  ^  <£"  g 

Cj             ^      J         „      ^      S 

£      III  1  1 

•&-       -3-  -a    »-    a.   « 

i 

8 

N              «">           VO      I~> 
M                N                NO 

00                         Ov     w                N 

n 

c 
• 

X 

M 

'S 

•a 

j> 

M 

CQ 


1913.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.        685 


vd 

/- 

| 

00         s 
.S           £ 

jfc 

[ 

.3         -a 

J1 

i 

> 

g       .      2 

•»•                                     II 

§ 

1 

o  n   5 

1    ^     N 

II    ..    " 

?i                       £ 

F                 P 

•X3    ^3           4T 

o    S         . 

II  II     2 

-s- 

1 

_b 

0 

II 

H     H      H 

H                                  H 

H    EH 

•  tv 

H 

3!      5!       52 
!•)       PQ        OT 

i 

,  

jy                                              ^    -Q                     4J                                                  14,. 

3    c        ^                  2  -c    S 
«                   •  .  1    .  H                   o  ^-  g 

3 

^                  £  CQ    -  ^                   o    S    o 
«a                5  .      •  •                 «>VM 

I 

~ 

g       -5       -^N^*               S*^o 

r 

H 

C/1               [i]                    N    S      fl     Z                                       P-*-»C 

••->                        rtt/3t;O-                         coC 

«     ^jssr0^            -O-£E 

^           §           ^E'OMT3                    °SS 

i 

1 

£ 

•a 

T3   t3   73   T3 

rT*.     O           :>.«Ve«V                   "     O    *j 

•S  j&  '         ^  R  H  jT  H           y  -s  <« 

B  13    fl           ^lil^x^                 TOrtO 

bx)  "O    *O          "O 

< 

o 

O     O     O     O 

8wS        PQ^CJ^Ux        PQ-CS 

.£00        o 

-0 

M                 ^                                                         | 

o           P-                              § 

g 

^                    8.                              ^| 

§- 

0                  «                M                             3 

S                        £r        * 

n 

B 

^  ^ 

o                        ^         2* 

8 

3 

-3- 

1?          o                              +           ^     *     a. 

I 

$ 

OCT  7TO/)e  l>0, 

•*&•-*•! 

i     ^     §       -8-vTl  I 

—  '             s£                K       f*                                   ^       *u       V 

*3    ^P           .B           "*—  ^           9     s    9 

^                    O      ^        -J        *U                                         *^         "*•       ^- 

•  1    x  |  s  I     ii     ||s 

o 
f  - 

1  3       S 

1 

a. 

fc 

a    o    o  _i_    5 

*      1-      3.    ^    <S> 

+     S.^Sx     3     I?-? 

h-H       ^                 ^ 

-',            I 

D. 
T) 

£ 

«         tT 

Cfl 

C 

cx 

—                                              »? 

bO 

">     « 

rt                                      -5 

C/3                                                 ^^ 

u 

3      s 

(Xi  -a  ^ 

s                     -s 

I-*                                                  O 

1 

u 

rt     >,„   J<! 

<!                                   P3 

h 

b                                                  b 

i—i 

A         5 

2                                         ^ 

Hi 

5        ^ 

1 

:                s 

<§            b 

1 

| 

§  1             ! 

S      w      P- 

3-   S  * 

Q..    N     2 
r    B    9 

"? 

s 

%  ^  S  2 

•ft  e  H 

°    X                                       •<     3 
X     «.                                       »=     S 

b     *     >~ 
CJ      b     1* 

S   £•  ?    ° 
3.  *6  B  i 

-a   —  -   a.    « 

1 

" 

n  ro 

« 

686 


Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.     [Oct.. 


>  s 

•:    O 


bO  .g 


•S      -6 


t  £  M  £ 
S  2    a,  &, 


1 


w 
•J 

pq 


0    CO 

S    SD  o 


•3  6° 

C/2     J*  «Q 

03     o 

.2"5M 


o    o    o    o 


I    S        it 

t»       <"     10       C,  10       g        »• 

'S    'S    -8    'g  -8    •<      *• 

"«  *e    ^  ^    ^    ^    ^  *s 

&     ^    10     **    10    10     ®     •»» 


S  2  t 

rt    -S     P- 
>     8    X 


a 


.b     3 


STUDIES  IN  THE  SEPTUAGINTAL  TEXTS 
OF  LEVITICUS 


NUMBER  THREE 


80        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.       [Jan. 


ARTICLE  V. 

STUDIES  IN  THE  SEPTUAGINTAL  TEXTS   OF 
LEVITICUS. 

BY  HAROLD  M.  WIENER,   M.A.,   LL.B.,  OF  LINCOLN^   INN, 
BARRISTER- AT-LAW. 

III. 

IN  dealing  with  the  groups  that  remain  to  be  considered 
we  must  take  a  short  course  on  account  of  the  deficiencies  of 
the  apparatus.  The  group  fir  cannot  be  satisfactorily  treated 
because  its  members  separate  so  often  that  it  is  frequently 
impossible  to  discover  what  its  true  reading  was.  It  should, 
however,  be  remembered  that,  as  was  shown  in  the  Biblio- 
theca  Sacra  for  April,  1913,  the  MS.  f  in  particular  often 
has  readings  which  are  independently  attested  by  the  Latin 
Vulgate,  and  that,  however  carelessly  it  may  be  written,  it 
must  always  rank  as  one  of  the  most  important  Septuagintal 
authorities.  I  desire  here  to  indorse  the  remarks  made  about 
it  by  Dahse  in  his  "  Textkritische  Materialien  zur  Hexateuch- 
frage "  (vol.  i.).,  with  the  reservation  that  I  do  not  agree 
with  his  attribution  of  it.  The  group  seems  to  me  to  be,  in 
the  main,  either  Hesychian  or  pre-Hexaplar. 

Moreover,  the  method  of  treating  the  Egyptian  versions, 
to  which  allusion  was  made  in  the  first  article  of  this  series, 
renders  the  task  of  dealing  with  texts  that  are  possibly  or 
probably  Hesychian  much  harder  than  that  of  handling  the 
Lucianic  groups.  Of  the  three  groups  that  remain  —  the  B 
group,  the  F  group,  and  qu  —  the  third  seems  to  present  a 
text  that  is  in  some  ways  akin  to  the  texts  of  Mob2.  A  very 


1914.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.         81 

important  passage  for  our  purposes  is  to  be  found  in  chap- 
ter v.  2.  The  text  of  B  ends  with  aicadapTwv,  but  FbGMacb2, 
gn,  dpt,  esvz  (j  is  here  missing),  qu,  Arm,  Ethc,  Or-lat,  and 
Eus  read,  with  minor  variations,  rwv  atcaOapTwv  77  Ovr)<nfjt,atov 
epTrerov  axadaprov  KCLI  \adrj  cnr'  avrou  teat  O.VTOS  pefjuavrai 
KCLI  ir\r]ij,fjie\r}<rr).  This  is  clearly  an  addition  to  the 
original  Septuagintal  text;  and,  in  fact,  the  asterisk  is 
found  in  some  MSS.,  though  it  is  differently  placed.  The 
words  are  present  in  the  Massoretic  text.  Now  it  happens 
that,  in  the  minor  variations,  Mqub2,  Ethc,  and  Or-lat  hold 
together  almost  continuously,  reading  ra>v  aKaOaprtav  tcai  \aOij 
CLTT  O.VTQV  tcai  [Ethc  omits  this  word]  /ie/uaz/rat.  (It  should  be 
remarked  parenthetically  that  the  Greek  translators  appear 
to  have  read  fpe>  for  the  Massoretic  pt?  earlier  in  the  verse, 
and  to  have  found  it  differently  placed:  and  the  displacement 
has  led  to  some  of  the  trouble.)  Here  the  addition  as  found 
in  qu,  etc.,  is  not  so  faithful  to  the  Massoretic  text  as  the 
reading  of  the  Lucianic  authorities;  while  G  and  Eus  follow 
a  middle  course,  omitting  the  words  ^  to  aicadaprov,  but  re- 
taining the  other  words  which  qu  omit.  Therefore  we  have 
here  four  important  types  of  reading: — 

( 1 )  The  original  LXX,  omitting  these  words :  this  is  here 
represented  by  BAy(h)a2,  F*klm,  ox,  bw,  fir,  Boh,  Lat.    (In  h 
the  first  few  words  of  the  addition  are  found;  but,  as  we 
have  previously  had  occasion  to  notice,  this  MS.  gives  us  a 
text  which  has  been  glossed  from  some  Lucianic  source.) 

(2)  The  Lucianic  reading,  agreeing  most  fully  with  the 
Massoretic  text,  represented  with  minor  variations  by  Fbac, 
gn,  dpt,  Arm,  and  esvz. 

(3)  The  reading  of  Eusebius  and  G,  giving  us  the  Pales- 
tinian text. 

(4)  The  reading  of   Mqub2,  Ethc,  Or-lat,  which  is   here 


82        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.      [Jan. 

more  remote  from  the  Massoretic  text  than  either  of  the 
other  two.  This  reading  is  at  least  as  old  as  Origen,  whose 
quotations  are  not  always  Hexaplar. 

Clearly  Hesychius  must  have  followed  either  (1)  or  (4)  — 
probably  the  former.  The  passage  is  interesting  for  the  his- 
tory of  the  LXX  as  a  whole  and  for  the  antecedents  of  the 
text  of  qu  in  particular.  It  may  now  be  recalled  that  in 
chapter  xvi.  10  qu  and  Mob2  were  among  the  non-Lucianic 
authorities  that  presented  the  Lucianic  addition,  which  in 
some  form  was  probably  older  than  Lucian,  as  it  occurs  in 
the  Latin. 

On  the  whole,  however,  I  see  no  reason  to  suspect  qu  of 
presenting  a  text  that  is  in  the  main  Hexaplar  or  Lucianic. 
It  appears  to  me  to  be  one  of  the  least  distinctive  and  inter- 
esting of  those  that  have  come  down  to  us.  The  fact  that  it 
seems  to  be  strongly  Egyptian  in  certain  chapters  of  Exodus 
of  course  proves  nothing  for  Leviticus,  and  it  is  noteworthy 
that  it  seldom  seems  to  present  readings  in  this  book  that 
appear  to  be  Hesychian.  My  studies  have  led  me  to  agree 
with  Dahse's  conclusion  that  this  group  does  not  bear  a 
recensional  character,  and  I  think  it  goes  back  to  an  arche- 
type wmch  presented  the  KOIVTJ,  more  or  less  influenced  by 
the  general  mixing  of  texts.  It  is  thus  largely  pre-Hexaplar. 

In  Tables  IX.  and  X.,  certain  readings  of  the  B  group 
in  Leviticus  xxii.  and  Fl  in  Leviticus  xxv.  are  respectively 
taken  as  the  standards.  A  number  of  the  readings  given 
merely  illustrate  the  peculiarities  of  other  groups  (gn,  dpt, 
etc.),  which  have  been  discussed  in  the  previous  articles  and 
are  cited  for  this  purpose  only.  Such  are  readings  in  xxii. 
3,  6,  10,  12,  19,  21,  23,  32;  xxv.  2,  5,  6,  14,  29.  It  will  be 
seen  that  the  various  groups  fully  retain  the  mutual  relation- 
ships that  we  have  already  noted.  Two  readings  in  chapter 


1914.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.         83 

xxv.  are  quoted  because  of  suggestive  resemblances  between 
Egyptian  versions  and  particular  MSS.  The  first  is  xxv. 
14-15,  where  the  misplaced  icai  in  f  and  the  Bohairic  is  very 
important.  No  sense  can  be  made  of  the  word  in  this  posi- 
tion; and  the  improbability  that  it  should  have  been  mis- 
placed in  this  way  independently  in  two  different  texts 
strongly  favors  the  view  that  we  have  here  a  copyist's  error 
that  originated  in  Egypt.  In  the  other  passage  (xxv.  29), 
the  Sahidic,  a2,  and  x  present  traces  of  a  common  origin. 

Next,  as  to  the  relationship  between  the  B  group  and  Fl. 
If  these  tables  be  carefully  considered,  it  will  be  seen  that, 
on  the  whole,  these  two  groups  are  extremely  alike,  and  that 
the  differences  between  them  in  these  two  tables  (apart  from 
the  usual  sources  of  scribal  error)  are  chiefly  due  to  two  causes : 
(1)  Hexaplar  or  Hebrew  influence  on  one  of  the  two  types 
(e.g.  on  B  in  xxii.  21 ;  xxv.  2,  7,  etc.,  on  F  in  xxii.  5,  7,  18, 
etc.)  ;  and  (2)  slight  grammatical  revision  of  the  F  text  (e.g. 
xxv.  10,  €<rnvj  54).  Generally  speaking,  the  two  groups  be- 
long to  one  and  the  same  family.  As  has  previously  been 
remarked,  m  and  k  go  closely  with  Fl,  though  k  is  in  many 
respects  one  of  the  most  Hebraized  of  MSS.  But  there  is 
one  other  fact  to  be  noted,  viz.  that  the  F  group  rarely  shares 
the  readings  of  B  that  appear  to  be  specifically  Hesychian. 
This  suggests  that  the  F  group  goes  back  to  an  archetype 
which  presented  the  Kotvr)  in  a  form  similar  to  that  on  which 
Hesychius  worked. 

In  Table  IX.,  we  have  the  readings  of  a  new  witness,  A6. 
This  is  a  fourth-century  Sinaitic  vellum  text.  In  the  readings 
quoted  it  always  agrees  with  one  or  more  members  of  the 
B  group,  except  where  it  has  a  text  that  is  peculiar  to  itself 
and  may  be  due  to  individual  scribal  error  (ver.  4,  13).  It 
is  to  be  observed  that  in  verses  11,  13,  and  28  it  is  the  only 


84        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.      [Jan. 

other  MS.  that  supports  members  of  this  group;  while  in 
verses  10,  18,  19,  and  31  it  has  readings  that  help  to  establish 
its  close  relationship  to  the  group. 

In  chapter  xxii.  some  of  the  more  important  pre-Hexaplar 
readings  preserved  by  B  and  its  allies  appear  to  be  in  verses 
3,  7,  9,  12,  13,  18,  24,  28,  and  31.  In  verse  22  the  authori- 
ties in  the  fifth  column  seem  to  have  kept  the  original  LXX. 
In  verse  30  aur^is  a  second  rendering  of  Ninn,  which  is  already 
represented  by  etceivrj.  In  chapter  xxv.  F  seems  to  have  re- 
tained pre-Hexaplar  readings  in  verses  2  (orav),  7,  32,  35,  36, 
and  52;  while  in  verse  9  B  and  its  allies  appear  to  have  a 
Hesychian  reading,  and  the  authorities  in  the  fifth  column 
have  pre-Hexaplar  readings  in  verses  10  (gn  and  its  allies), 
32,  33,  and  50  (B  and  its  allies).  The  addition  to  the  text 
of  dpt  in  verse  2  represents  a  not  infrequent  characteristic 
of  this  group,  which  seems  to  contain  a  certain  number  of 
Greek  glosses  over  and  above  the  class  consisting  of  repeated 
phrases,  which  it  shares  with  the  Armenian  and  gn. 

On  the  whole,  it  seems  to  me  that  the  B  group  in  Leviticus 
is  descended,  in  the  main,  from  a  Hesychian  text,  though  it 
has  been  influenced  from  other  sources  —  particularly  by  the 
Hexaplar  readings. 

It  may  be  well  to  .note  a  few  readings  that  appear  to  be 
specifically  Hesychian.  In  ii.  13  the  words  Kvpua  T<W  6ew  vpav 
appear  (with  minor  modifications)  in  BAyha2,  fi,  bw,  and 
Cyril;  but  they  are  omitted  by  the  Massoretic  text,  all  the 
other  Cambridge  MSS.,  the  Armenian,  Bohairic,  Ethiopic, 
Latin,  and  Philo.  It  is  noteworthy  that  the  best  pre-Hexaplar 
authorities  here  are  on  the  side  of  the  Massoretic  text,  and 
so  lend  special  importance  to  Cyril's  reading.  In  iv.  22  feat 
dpapTTj  occur  in  BAha2  (y  is  missing),  x,  b,  fi,  Bohw,  and 
Cyr  Y-2.,  being  omitted  in  the  Massoretic  text,  all  the  other 


1914.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.         85 

Cambridge  MSS.,  Arm,  Boh1,  Eth,  and  in  Cyr  l/2.  In  v.  15 
T(OV  ayicov  is  read  by  BAy,  Boh,  and  Cyr-ed;  while  most  MSS., 
Arm,  Ethc,  Latw,  Or-lat,  and  Cyr-cod  follow  the  Massoretic 
text  in  reading  rco  a<yico.  In  vi.  30  (23)  f or  TO>  =  Massoretic 
text,  A,  ko,  b',  f,  qu,  M(mg),  Or-lat,  and  Cyr-ed,  read  TOTTO). 
The  testimony  of  Or-lat  proves  that  this  reading  was  pre- 
Hesychian,  but  Cyr-ed  shows  that  it  was  adopted  by  Hesy- 
chius.  In  iv.  7  BAha2,  w,  Boh,  Latz  (vid),  and  Cyr  have 
ra)v  6\oKavT(0fj,aTa>vt  where  all  the  other  Septuagintal  authori- 
ties and  the  Massoretic  text  have  a  singular  word.  The 
fact  that  w  here  seems  to  present  a  Hesychian  reading  is  not 
important,  as  this  MS.  goes  back  to  a  text  that  had  been 
heavily  glossed.  Thus  in  Leviticus  i.  13,  14;  ii.  4,  for  6\o- 
icavTwua,  it  reads  pvpov,  a  corruption  of  Aquila's  Trvpov;  and 
in  iii.  16  it  actually  presents  \eycov  pvpov  ("  meaning  fivpov") 
as  its  text.  But  the  other  points  of  contact  between  Hesy- 
chius  and  bw  may  have  importance  in  the  ultimate  tracing  of 
the  bw  text. 

Summing  up  the  main  results  of  our  inquiry,  we  may  say 
that,  of  the  non-Hexaplar  groups,  qu  and  Fl  do  not  appear 
to  have  a  recensional  character.  Of  the  others,  ejsvz  seems 
to  be  a  late  recension,  and  gn  and  dpt  have  close  relations  to 
the  Armenian  and  the  Antiochian  fathers.  They  show  the 
impress  of  two  minds,  not  of  one;  and,  though  nearly  con- 
nected, must  not  be  treated  as  a  single  recension.  Ranged 
against  them  are  BAyN  A6ha2  (which  is  largely  Hesychian) , 
and  fir.  Of  this  last  group  it  is  impossible  to  say  much, 
owing  to  the  vicissitudes  which  its  text  has  undergone  in 
transmission.  Of  the  Hexaplar  group,  c  has  special  rela- 
tions to  the  Antiochian  authorities,  Mob2  are  connected  with 
qu;  and  k  and  m,  with  Fl;  o  and  x  probably  embody  some 


86        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.      [Jan. 

Hesychian  readings.  Of  the  B  group,  h  has  been  largely 
glossed  from  some  Lucianic  source.  Lastly,  the  group  bw 
preserves  a  recension  that  has  a  marked  character  of  its  own, 
strongly  influenced  by  the  later  Hebrew  and  largely  recast, 
but  containing  many  pre-Hexaplar  readings  and  interesting 
points  of  contact,  alike  with  Lucian  and  Hesychius.  All  our 
MSS.  and  groups  contain  pre-Hexaplar  and  Hexaplar  read- 
ings, and  all  have  been  influenced  by  the  general  mixing  of 
texts. 

It  is  important  to  observe  that  the  results  we  have  attained 
for  the  book  of  Leviticus  agree  very  largely  with  those 
reached  by  Rahlfs  for  the  Psalter.  This  is  the  more  interest- 
ing, as  I  had  done  most  of  the  work  for  these  articles  be- 
fore looking  at  his  volume.1  He  holds  that,  in  that  book, 
B  is  Hesychian,  that  55  (=  h)  contains  many  Hesychian 
readings,  and  that  Hesychius  took  as  the  basis  of  his  work 
an  Egyptian  text  similar  in  character  to  that  which  formed 
the  foundation  of  Origen's  labors  and  altered  it  very  little 
(p.  235).  This  latter  finding  entirely  agrees  with  the  facts 
we  have  had  occasion  to  notice  in  Leviticus  regarding  the 
resemblance  between  the  text  of  the  B  group  and  the  F 
group,  Mob2,  qu,  etc.,  and  also  the  frequent  separation  of 
the  authorities  into  two  main  types  of  text  —  those  represent- 
ing a  Lucianic  form  and  all  others,  either  with  or  without 
Origen's  asterisked  or  obelized  passages.  Further,  Rahlfs 
points  out  that  Lucian  corrected  a  text  that  perhaps  differed 
from  the  others  to  agree  with  the  Massoretic,  and  freely  al- 
tered it  in  many  details  (p.  236).  This,  again,  fits  in  with 
the  observations  we  have  made  for  Leviticus.  When  he  fur- 
ther adds  that  a  Lucianic  text  with  some  modifications  be- 
came the  official  text  of  the  Greek  Church,  we  are  reminded 
1  Septuaginta-Studien,  vol.  ii.  (1907). 


1914.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.         87 

of  Dahse's  view  that  the  lectionary  dz  follows  the  text  of 
dnpt  in  Genesis.  But  I  think  that  in  Leviticus  there  are  more 
types  of  text  than  in  the  Psalms,  and  that  this  complicates 
the  problem.  In  Kings  he  holds  that  the  Ethiopia  is  pre- 
Hexaplar,  in  the  Psalter  mainly  Hesychian.  From  what  we 
have  seen,  it  would  appear  that  in  Leviticus  it  certainly  has 
a  pre-Hexaplar  basis.  Undoubtedly  in  the  readings  we  have 
had  occasion  to  examine  it  has  had  none  of  the  specifically 
Lucianic  characteristics.  Neither,  on  the  other  hand,  is  it 
quoted  for  distinctively  Hesychian  readings;  but  it  often  pre- 
sents pre-Hexaplar  characteristics,  and  is  frequently  seen  in 
isolated  agreement  with  groups  or  MSS.  that  appear  to  con- 
tain the  Koivr)  in  a  more  or  less  unmixed  form. 

Further,  though  we  have  been  unable  to  make  much  study 
of  the  Egyptian  versions,  for  the  reasons  already  noted,  I 
think  it  not  improbable  that  the  remarks  Rahlfs  makes  re- 
specting the  Sahidic  in  the  Psalter  may  prove  to  be  true  of 
Leviticus  also.  He  thinks  that  this  version  represents  a  pre- 
Hexaplar  text  which  had  not  been  influenced  by  a  recension,1 
and  shows  with  what  license  the  text  was  treated.  Now  we 
Tiave  seen  an  addition  in  xxv.  2  and  may  note  a  couple  of 
-readings  in  the  last  verse  of  the  book.  To  "  Lord,"  Sah  adds 
Deus;  and  for  "to  the  children  of  Israel  in  Mount  Sinai," 
it  reads  "  in  Mount  Sinai  to  announce  to  the  children  of  Is- 
rael," with  Eth,  which  has  "  that  he  might  speak"  for  "to 
announce,"  and  f,  which,  however,  has  only  the  Sahidic  or- 
der without  its  addition. 

1Op.  oit.,  p.  219. 


88        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus. 


^  "3   to 

..  §  rt 

CU 

. 

^ 

.    to  "** 

'S 

** 

Remarks 

JJ 

rx- 
r 

IJu 

ill 

3     5)     U 

to  .w 

^ 

"o 

x 

^J 

z 

S      * 

II      3 

n 

^'  O^K  Werai 

1 
ftl 

H 

S  8  « 

g 

pi 

H        H 

H 

\ 

H  H 

S 

>,.S2  •£ 

£ 

S 

S        S 

» 

"o 

S  S 

h 

-C      S             ,Ci 

T) 

_£. 

0] 

M 

•ga 

<u 

a, 

W  ^        W 

O 
y 

PQ 

g.S 

•S 

X 

o 

J   g 

oJ                  nl 

g 

g 

S  rt 

w 

£       ~ 

W    ^          C« 

^•J 

_4 

Authorities  pr 
alternative  re 

HH 

a, 

•a 

& 

N  Mac  (pr  (tov 

•J  S  ^ 
>S  W 

^    60  ,rf 

43     CU         -g 
O    "O            O 

PQ    c        PQ 

g     bO           g 
Ex          C 

<J   S       <J 
"^  *~^   ^  r^ 

i-i    j    >   i« 

O    <    43     O 

"O    y 
0   A 

o     Cy 

<    C/2 

>,  rt    O 
U  ^  03 

> 

y. 

'a? 

o 

CO      *-» 

0     5    43 

r5    "i 
^i  ^J  en 

> 

• 

Ea 

S 

ft 

c  — 

•  S  « 

3  , 

C 

i 

X! 

"  « 
«H 

. 

§ 

§ 

»—  i 

•s  g 

2 

3. 

t 

^ 

& 

W 

PQ 

«  S 
E-c 
£* 

< 

1 

o 
I- 

i 

a 

0 

(- 

-a 

^ 
o 
h 

b     § 
3     Q. 
b     k    •" 

s  o  5 

?-    N     rt 
•a  -s    > 

cS     §.           i-. 

^  k  -s  r 

TO        *4>                   —" 
>      /<      "S"      & 

avroi; 

j 

pr  cbro 
ai/rou  &rn 

a 
•S 

o 

2 

.5 

•H 

to 

? 

C 

M 

~2 

O 

C 

M 

•5  o, 

V    3 

°~ 

M 

h 

.S 

V-    O 

Hw 

£>M, 

42 

rt 

i*. 

u 

fa 

rt 

O 

to 

1 

| 

If 

—     8 

T3 
f 

o 

bO 

|    _ 

3 

£ 

T3   -O 

,    T) 

<! 

•g 

£ 

•a   ?• 

_ 

-a" 

1-       U> 

0     0 

JP    i- 
<1     O 

42* 

0 

<f  42 

0    t 

rt" 

A 

£ 

2 

'^ 

cS* 

"T* 

e- 

^rf 

-a 

OQ 

o 

^_^ 

S 

cT 

43 

tT*-* 

PQ 

Readings  of 

1 

•o 

o 

V  * 

1 

li 

u 

1  §  < 

-§-  S-PQ^ 

M>       Q.      »j 

®    fe    b 

-o    X   -o 

3 
a 

S 

k 

10 

b 

M 

V-     -i*> 

o\i  (payerai 
i 

1—4 

- 

ro 

».^ 

« 

- 

00 

1914.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.         89 


•p 

p  p     II 

E-  H      H 

s 

sf                     £    '" 

ii    P    H  *  " 

H        H        H    ex 

n 

3  ^                 " 

f-S         S 

o. 

II 

H 

-d 

0 

II 

|     ^ 

01 
r-i                                                    ^t-1 

*j                                     O 

it 
P* 

T3 
0 
U 

T     ^ 
«      1 

1       ^ 

w             s, 

i                 s 

*                     6 

a,                      i 
-a                       < 

X!            u                           ^ 

S                  KV                „                   >, 

W         (j          >         O 

S           J2     •-     ""             fe 

£         o  -o  ^  -     x> 
<       «  «    |       E 

^3 

w 

o 

P5 

"3    >, 

*:  u 

O    y 

[  Cyr-cod 

<j 

e                 >-          d 

•S            S 

XI     o 

~ 

•H     -a  i 

•U    °     ^   °     ! 

o  <f  U  £  C 

3         1                «|5 
=-•2    e-2        "H    e  J 

)obOO^3ObO< 

o       i;   ^  ^  s  rt 
°      «  rt  a.E 

^     -a  "S  »  =  ^ 

JQ            O     O    X     bC  Z 

VJ                            1- 

P             <5 

U                          "^ 

<^    <J   ro     o 

0     ^ 

OJ    ^t    << 

c 

- 

"V 

<r^          p- 

o 

-     |           X 
8             8     ?             2- 

b        E  "I        g  .a 

-     3 

tilt 

!. 

t-     u          u 

*i^       Ctf                rt 

•2       -2  ~  —  «  "**  L§ 

i  *  H 

**N»  ^  v  "tj 

^  -8    -5      5 

Ii 

3 

| 

8     >            > 

O       «       O     "8       >       t-       CH 

D.           p-  +    o     CX    CX 

Cu    CX    CX    > 

t- 

-s 

^ 

T3 
O 

JQ 

o 

SbO 

13 

c 

_     a 

19 

x!        -a 

ps    1 

C    i-         a 

•<  .*       fe 

E 

1      f 
^"2  °«          ^  "S 

<j  o  <r  <     o  o 

a.    U 
o 

E^       «p    u     i- 
xi  •<  o   o 

^     ~l 

e^i 
-  ^° 

<u  f 

6     MH 
<f     ? 

•G 

5. 

u 

^^ 

^*                      /^~N  '*'^s  /< 

^^ 

§ 

•<            I?   cs    5" 

rt^ 

a             s~^ 

PQ              >^^    §- 
^^            <    >~,  i 

g 

x^ 

^    "«f 

n                 rt* 

PQ  <J  .M 

m^ 

^ 

^. 

"R3      ">, 

o            03           sv     -c 
-          M     h           3   y 

-*               -*      Q               i*»  ^ 

e.    ^T"  ^ 

0 

< 

R 
X 

*     "i           PQ 
V'*"        8 

^8            <S> 

Q       s  s                   »O 

8               8    -Cf             ?     >> 

fc          fe    *          e-m 

«"             8-^3^- 

-e-       -e-  -^<!    *   g 

•=>   ^  -=>     «  »     3     a- 

O     *I^     O     *U*     ^-^     K     *S 

w             r?'    S     8     >^  ^ 

1      *r-  £-  fc  V  cf 
x      <  5  £  ?•  «g. 

8.^-jP3      N      8      8      >» 

4  •F^r'  *.     ?M 

V      *7          »         O       »^i         fe       *—  ' 

3 

3- 
«£ 

3- 

-i 

0\ 

O                    N*            M     PO 

00 

0 

Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.      [Jan. 


1 

-S 


X 

I— I 

w 


S  I 

C      <fl 

1 

•a    S 

0    * 
C     X 

T3 

M 

*S 
•2   o« 

PQ        PQ        PQ                          o 
II          II    P   II                           II 

N 

H        H  H  H                        H 

w  1 

s.    s  s  s              s 

N 

> 

**« 

•s  8) 

°oT 

U*         ^=  <£ 

?5 

Authorities  preseni 
alternative  readin 

•5           ^ 
w     § 

-i-.        PQ    S 
-a*        is  .< 

e  •§£  «, 

£2     *N     C             rt 
bO    O     bO  43    M 

43                   W     2                                          ^     >, 

W              w    "                             r5?0 
^              S  '«        f  3              «  « 

O                   01    ^            C   ^                   rt    •- 

PQ             '5T  ^       V  8             "J  -^ 

§'.        ^-x^Sg        ^"§"0 
^^        c^l<^        «  S  M 

?>           T3           'O     «     rt     p»^    _     N    *^     ^    *^3    "& 
G   J3     v.     O<J     O&|HSc3     bo'oTo/3     O     O 

2     3    | 

i 

*i.§- 

3 

•13 

»  •  • 

o     & 

1 

Alternative  rea 
where  matet 

.E     S     a 
,     |           §     §•    1 

ll          &1    * 

1-      «i'°8 

3     8                    &      h      ;. 

S  -  2   h  g  S   s 
i  -5  B       S  •   --fc 

3.     Q.     \u       *-       »              *» 
*<J    "tJ     <O      C-     R     *P*     O 

1      8: 
a                                     s 

1           °                                                            >      8     b      w 

•35k                                                                                           Sl-^fc-S 
5       M                                                                         O       <u       O       w       n 

*^     o_    8                                                      b     b    "^  JJJ!     K 
k-'og"!1"           *•                                ^^^^^ 

U      1-       i        U              _l_'t;l3                ^       g*     y     Q.     g>-       • 

1 

M 

M 

k 

C 

^»  -^ 

^ 

^& 

U     8 

"    &           1    3 

f 

x    1 

JL-I 

•f  1 

Is-,          &    •- 

&       *     1  %              :?     1 

3 

•^          rO    T3     °          T)                  ^>,           "> 

** 

<f  -8     O     O 

J2*           u     O    <1             O     fi           2i             £ 

1 

? 

rt                                 8 

K 

8                    ^ 

/S         ^i                                 fc           S^ 

"o 

b                   "5 

<J            "*•                               fe.          S- 

cj.           PQ 

#                      ^H                                                           ^      *"  —  ^      (A 

c 

-8                   ^-^ 

PQ                PQ                °                              X  o?""     « 

1 

H 

1     e  1 

1        £    = 

^        t.  f,   f         o    |   J     b 

-y             <O     <E> 

*         -i-iS         -p-    fe   O   fe           s. 

M 

?      8^                                        S      ?         ff      & 

1914.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.         91 


1  -"S 

II       z; 

.S 

a    ^    o 

~o  r  z 

•O      W 

n      li 

^        £        0 

'So 

**•            rt           I  j 

H 

c 

J 

-S     o 

^^           W           fj 

B 

is    ^ 

"P  "2 

0     0 

*  Xol 

g1      1       r" 

1 

4)      4J 
rt     CX          » 

1!    II 

.b     •- 

•^     jj.    rj) 

5    6  II         £ 

cr^  ng 
•o    o  *•    *-« 

H  H 

^     K   '^ 

c    s  H        H 

-£:_:_ 

S  S 

<•<    a  i 

t,     -H,     S                f". 

.^•5  S  S 

•^ 

a 

3 

u 

.is 

• 

1  i 

N 

in 

N 

|| 

'S| 

c 

^"o    ^ 

'57 
E 

V 

S 

^£ 

_  «• 
g  > 

X 

0 

u3  <  ^  ^ 

o 
111 

E               o. 

li 

/ 

^  _j  ^  j-  i 

3    "^    g    J3 

-o  -isl|      t 

<  * 

>, 

o    o    o  W  < 

C     bO  X    M 

MM                  C                 C 

O    S    13    J3    ^     60 

K    T3    CC 

H 

B 

Iw    IK 

•3 

3     3 

01 

B  *"* 

X 

I 

i 

1    v 

§ 

5                         Q       O       O 

§•          §.§.?. 

3           S     2     3     o 

w 
hJ 

1 

t« 

-  ^ 

3     cJ    jjj> 

u  o  i 

D.    k-     b 

b     rt 
S     ° 

"a    > 

•£•   £  -a"  -a"  -a"  ° 

+  +  ?  e  g  1 

PQ 
< 
H 

-<u    n.  ex 

•s 

1 

JB 

M 

C 

0 

PQ 

c   O. 
V    S 

fe? 

£  "3° 

K 

«  & 

~! 
£  12  ^ 

"o 

pa 

'•c-E 
I 

-e 
H 

•G    -i-    8 

T3    T3 

B  —  j  ^3 

3 

•0   T3 

M          °       ^ 

X:    <     « 

O     O 

«  t-    t- 

<J     O     0 

-     i- 
0     0 

i? 

-e 

E 

?£* 

„? 

I    1 

"o 
t>c 

^t          CQ 

pj-   ^T* 

.s 

^  8  ,1 

i  M 

4  I 

1 

a 
h 

3*    y    >ji^ 
1-   a   I- 

It 

a        •<> 
-fe           o 

«  f 

B  v  % 

n   8 

B     o    ^-^ 

-o     b 

CO 

c\  o 

M      CO 

"•     ri 
CO    CO 

X 

N 

92        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.      [Jan. 


^o 

'J.    > 

r: 

£J   f* 

1 

r 

r  *- 

9 

»i^ 

'JL     s 

"T3 

3 

^ 

5 

f~     *^ 

o                       t- 

a 

11 

rl 

II                                   X. 

H 

H 

H     ; 

H                        H 

N                          P- 
>                          t~ 

£ 

o 

y 

M 

•S 

.=  3) 

v'-n 

3      MH        >                    P" 

u.     o     <n           *• 

| 

S 

a 
£:- 

Authorities'  pres 
alternative  rea 

N     S)               2^ 

8  £  "o               "S 
"   -   M        Q.      en 

•X    -S     60 
9*  «•*•   S                 t*    *^ 
>O  H    B           c     #    u 

c,  -  ^        5  -°  O 
xi    g    a.       <;  -^  M 

S     C     60    O     3)  -3"  f1! 

•p 
o 

o 

/T*       A                   ^ 
U         o                   ••• 

r.            W                                  i- 

J3              "^                          ^    £ 

&           -I"                      U     < 

^      fe     C    ^      fe    "^      •£ 
n    ^     60    O    ,T3     O    ^3 

•5 

VI 

™ 

j 

o 

Boh  pr  zwfo'.r  «/ 

GMk*  :  -trcu  c  : 
ord  :  Philo 

tj 

O 

1 

B 

> 

§ 

P, 

Alternati 

3 
X 

3-      b                  *•       * 

h     §     g     S     3           3 

•  •«  i  i.  J-      g 

*O              S,     "w      *^              v 

-M,       t»     *CJ     *U»      "I                     l" 

rt 
H 

S 

S                          i. 
a     b                         5k   *3 
1.  -e-  -    -    «    2    * 

§  •«  s  ?  t  e-  c 

J  +  2  -S   3.  S  >S 

p- 
"3 

1 

=t  -s 

•—    P* 
a,  a. 

'^ 

'i 

v 

£• 

£ 

N 

t~ 

|| 

•2 

-           | 

"a. 

3 

n  eib 

^r 

X 

& 

3             ^ 

"9 

c 
o 

rt 

:|l 

s 

-c' 

•S              •°* 

b 

P"    a 

| 
1 

"^  *^  "^  ^  *rt 

B  *•  '  B  -3  ••• 

o    o    o  PQ    o 

Gckmx 

N 

i 

e       1  i 

t—      j-t              .-i    TjJ            t—  < 

o    o         S  W        S 

u 

0 

"   p- 

m  -§• 

N 

_ 

£ 

"3 

H 

§ 

'ir 

i 

• 

E 

C 

o 

W 

o 

_- 

b 

1 

X 

1       S  S- 

*°  "^    o    g.  ^~ 

* 

1 

b 

Is      «    ? 

<<   |       p  2"       f 

I 

3- 
K 

3-    P-    ^  ^     & 
v-     t-   -rJ   "C     i- 

^ 

t- 

wj>    ^            b     P           *2 

•^4*     "M»                ***»        (5                  O 

o 

-5 

X 

if         LO        \o 

r. 

O^    O                                 i^ 

„ 

| 

w 
_i 
PQ 
< 
H 


1914.]  Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.         93 


-H 

\    -'- 

0 

f'; 

^ 

II                    r 

&-      *  ^          E          "^" 

"P 

0 

5         o         o         c 

O 

£         n 

•P     ii     n     n     !i 

II 

H             H 

t-i           C—  i           t—  i           f—  i             C 

4> 

H 

S          S 

s    s    s    s     es 

« 

s> 

ll 

Bo 
1 

4$  '» 

Jfr 

1       2     £     ~  g"l 

-  §  % 

'O                    -C            ^              E      C      g 

•o'jr  pq                             -o 

—               iJS       rf"                      pQ                                     "*       o        l 

to  ,2    »•                              o 

**H    *O    *+^    "    ^5    *O     o    *£}     W)    O    *O      i     ^D 

XX^^3*j^3^             t.            £ 

oTcfiOo'ooo        „       & 

—    — 
o   o 

B 

i 

d 

s     5J 

"»* 

1   ilfHill 

5                    o 

II 

1 

oto^^"        ^S^?£.^§-2- 

>    -u»     0^  Qi.         -^    -o     K    *<tt    -P*     i    *P"  "P* 

^^    ^     p"    rt     rt     Q_    rt            rt            ^ 

?•    rt 
?-    o 
:>     rt 
b     > 

*     ^     rt 

•a 

CO 

C^     •                         1-1    1-1    CO 

•1  c       M  >  •£  a-S 

14  ISs«i 

1_ 

£ 

e«     a.*J|l 

.C 

JM 

"r     ^          rt   ^T  ^-^  **<     > 

0 

-         f 

>>       B 

<    ••        js    o  *°    c    <u 
g  "2        !^  J    £    ^    o. 

PQ 

fl 

•a  TJ  T3  -a                -^            T3 

<J    >,^3<3    rts-/§    c 

—         1-         —         —                    *.                          N                                1- 

O     O     O     O           W             rt                    O 

PQ  U    oP2Svc"n    §S 

J<  X 

=> 

o 

I 

I     1     i    -2 

3             3                            3 

"*    "f"    t    <3-            b"          -fe                    ^ 
§    -S     3.  CQ.          -o            tt                  •$:• 

ll     T    -P 
I.J   -=l     S. 

P-                              Q.      3                    ?                  <to* 

i    all  IB    ? 

ffvyyevtitav 
(^xaffTos)  u/iwi< 

•^f-           w^   ro          r^         OO                   O* 

O            «     to  *^>         VO            to 

•f       Tf 

94        Studies  in  the  Septuagintal  Texts  of  Leviticus.      [JarL. 


w 
hJ 

K 
< 
H 


utho 
alter 


•  •       —     -—>     ft  °° 

•a' j  13:8 1  fa 

o^^MMfeoo 


-3 


g  8 

:1 


l 


vacat 
\vrpuff 


UC  SOUTHERN  REGIONAL  LIBRARY  FACILITY 


A     000  068  220     3 


